![]() THE SEVENTH BOOKE, Inscribed POLYHIMNIA, or MEMORIE.Of diuerse Wantons belonging to sundry famous men, and others.THE SIXT BOOKE, Inscribed ERATO: Treating of Chast Women, and of Women Wantons.Of warlike Women, and those of Masculine vertue.Intreating of Amazons: and other Women famous either for Valour, or for Beautie. THE FIFTH BOOKE inscribed TERPSICHORE.Of Women that haue come by strange Deaths. ![]() Of many great Ladies branded with Adultery amongst the Romans: and first of Posthumia.Of Lyuia Horestilla, Lollia Paulina, Cesonia, &c.Of Women incestuous, of Adulteresses, and such as haue come by strange deaths. Of Women remarkeable for their loue to their Husbands.Of Queenes and other Ladies for diuers vertues memorable.Of Dido, Cesara, Gumilda, and Ethelburga.Of diuers Ladies famous for their Modestie.Containing the Histories of sundry Noble Ladies. Treating of Illustrious Queenes, Famous Wiues, Mothers, Daughters, &c. THE THIRD BOOKE of Women, inscribed THALIA.Of the Muses, the Sybells, the Vestalls, the Prophetesses, the Hesperides, the Graces, &c.The Goddesses of the Hills, Woods, Groues, and Trees.Of the Goddesses, Coelestiall: and first of IVNO.The first booke which is CLIO, treating of the Goddesses Coelestiall, Terrestriall, Marine, and Infernall.NINE BOOKES OF VARIOVS HISTORIE, ONELIE concerning Women: Inscribed by the names of the nine Muses.AN INDEX, OR TABLE, of Nine Bookes of Various Historie, onely concerning Women, inscribed by the Names of the Nine MVSES.TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE, AND MOST NOBLE, EDVVARD SOMERSET, Earle of Worcester, Baron Herbert of Ragland, Lord Chepstowe, Strigull, and Gower, Lord Priuie Seale, Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter, and one of his Maiesties Priuie Councell.The issue of taxonomic consistency is one that many researchers would rather ignore our results show that the consequences of this may ultimately be severe. In the case of two palaeoecological data sets, a single consistent taxonomic error was capable of changing the pattern of environmental reconstruction beyond all recognition, totally removing any real palaeoenvironmental signal. Some plausible taxonomic confusions caused major biases in reconstructed values. Initially these experiments were carried out one error at a time using four modern training sets subsequently, multiple errors were separately simulated both in four modern training sets and in four palaeoecological data sets. Combinations of easily confused taxa were selected, and data manipulated to reflect confusion of these taxa transfer functions based on unmodified data were then applied to these modified data sets. In this study we assess the possible consequences of violation of this requirement by simulating taxonomic errors in testate amoeba data. A fundamental requirement of quantitative palaeoecology is consistent taxonomy between a modern training set and palaeoecological data. 2010: The perils of taxonomic inconsistency in quantitative palaeoecology: experiments with testate amoeba data. The perils of taxonomic inconsistency in quantitative palaeoecology: experiments with testate amoeba data The perils of taxonomic inconsistency in quantitative palaeoecology: experiments with testate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |