![]() In the City of London, daytime patrols were conducted by the City Marshall and the beadles. Night watchmen patrolled the streets between 9 or 10 pm until sunrise, and were expected to examine all suspicious characters. They also had a general responsibility to keep the peace, but there was no expectation that they should investigate or prosecute crimes. Increasingly, ordinary Londoners left the task of securing criminals to people who were motivated to do so by the prospect of financial or other rewards.Ĭonstables were required to apprehend anyone accused of a felony, and bring them before a justice of the peace. Moreover, the difficulties the authorities had in identifying and apprehending criminals led them to offer rewards to those whose arrests led to the conviction of serious criminals, and pardons to accomplices who were willing to turn in their confederates. For example, victims frequently paid thief-takers to locate and apprehend suspects. This sense of individual responsibility for law enforcement was eroded over the eighteenth century, however, as increasing numbers of men were paid to carry out this task. As the Proceedings frequently illustrate, cries of "stop thief!" or "murder!" from victims often successfully elicited the assistance of passers-by. Moreover, if summoned by a constable to join the "hue and cry", inhabitants were required to join in the pursuit of any suspected felon.Īlthough these legal obligations were rarely enforced, Londoners continued to help apprehend suspected criminals. ![]() Those who witnessed a felony were legally obliged to apprehend those responsible for the crime, and to notify a constable or justice of the peace if they heard that a crime had taken place. Throughout the period 1674 to 1829 many victims of crime were able to identify and apprehend the culprits before contacting a constable or a justice of the peace to secure their arrest. The official added that 15 cases were pending against the constable, including indiscipline and remaining absent from duty, and Circle Officer, Police Lines, Hira Lal Kanaujia has been asked to probe them.William Hogarth, 'The Four Stages of Cruelty', plate 3, 'Cruelty in Perfection' (1751). The SSP said the matter has been noted and Circle Officer (City) Abhishek Srivastava has been asked to probe the quality of food provided by the mess. Taking note of the issue, Senior Superintendent of Police Ashish Tiwari has ordered an inquiry. I have told DGP sir regarding the problem several times, but till date no solution has been provided." Kumar said, "The Reserve Inspector says that I will be suspended soon. The police mess manager, however, said that Kumar used to raise unnecessary hue and cry regarding the quality of food. He also said that bad quality food was provided despite assurances given by Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath that the allowances given to police personnel will be increased by around 30 per cent to ensure a nutritious diet for them. ![]() Through these people police personnel are provided poor quality food."Īction should be taken on this soon #YogiAdityanath /MDG74G7FXjĪlso Read | Govt assures nutritious food to flood-affected people It is a scam by the senior superintendent of police and the DCP. In the video clip, Kumar says, "The food that is being given is of the kind that even an animal cannot eat, but it is fed to us. ![]() The constable, Manoj Kumar, seen crying while staging a demonstration, was later whisked away by the police. A video clip of a police constable protesting over the quality of food being served to them has gone viral on social media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |